Weird and wonderful
wulijohyunjae | January 15, 2010 | 7:00 amI finally saw “Avatar”, the 3-D sci-fi epic that James Cameron wrote and directed and which took 15 years to make (from conception.) It has broken all box-office records, having already taken US$1 billion at the box office as of last week.
I suppose you all know “Avatar” is about a world of the future, set in the year 2154. It tells the story of a disabled marine sent on a mission to Pandora, a moon in the Alpha Centauri star system, home to a race of blue aliens called Na’vi. Humans are intent on exploiting Pandora for its resources but meet with resistance from the natives who live in perfect harmony with nature in their world.
This fantasy world, with its weird and wonderful plant and animal life, is brought to life using stunning special effects. The title “avatar” refers to the genetically engineered bodies used by the film’s characters to interact with the Na’vi.
The movie is 2 hours 45 minutes and is great entertainment. But does it live up to the hype? Yes and no. The special effects are spectacular; it could not have been made in 1994 when James Cameron first came up with the idea. But as I was watching, I kept thinking about cowboys and Indians (Red Indians, natives of America.) Essentially the same scenarios, the same sentiments, only repeated in outer space and in the future — old Hollywood traditions, old formulas, old cliches.
There is all this talk on the internet about people becoming depressed, even suicidal, after watching “Avatar” — because the ideal world on Pandora is not real, intangible, unreachable. And then there is the conspiracy theory of secret (subliminal) messages in the movie. All great press, resulting in great box office. The Americans are publicity geniuses.
The Lovely Bones
The next day I saw a totally different movie, Peter Jackson’s “The Lovely Bones”. Even though the slimmed-down Jackson is not as cute now as the chubby director of “Lord of the Rings”, his “Rings” trilogy will always remain as one of my all-time favourites.
“The Lovely Bones” opens with the narrator saying: “I was 14 years of age when I was murdered on Dec.6, 1973.” If that doesn’t startle you, I don’t know what will. Billed as “the story of a life and everything that came after…..”, this movie is weird and wonderful in a way very different from “Avatar”. The murdered girl is in a sort of in-between world (between earth and heaven), unable to let go, torn between her lingering desire for life and her desire for her family to heal.
Based on the critically acclaimed best-selling novel by Alice Sebold, “The Lovely Bones” is a very unusual kind of detective story, a sort of CSI conducted not by forensic scientists but by a ghost (?) The acting of the ensemble cast is superb, especially that of the young actress who plays the murdered girl — Saoirse Ronan, who is the younger sister in “Atonement.”
Thirst
I’ve got the DVD of this Korean movie for some time, but I kept putting off watching it. Can’t watch it at night because it’s about vampires. No time to watch it in the daytime. As it turned out, it was after dark that I finished it. What can I say? It’s…..weird…..and not that wonderful.
Written, produced, and directed by Park Chan-Wook (“Old Boy”) and loosely based on Emile Zola’s novel “Therese Requin”, “Thirst” tells the story of a priest who becomes a vampire because of a failed medical experiment. He struggles to control his insatiable thirst for blood until a love affair unleashes his darkest desires in deadly ways.
Director Park on “Thirst”: “It is about more than vampires. It is about passion and a love triangle. I feel it is unique because it is not just a thriller and not merely a horror film, but an illicit love story as well.” The film won the Jury Prize at the 2009 Cannes Film Festival.
There is a lot of blood (to drink) and sex, but ultimately I think the film fails because at 2 hours 14 minutes it is too long and it drags in parts. Song Kang-Ho (as the priest) and Kim Ok-Bin (as his lover) give their all, but when vampires behave like humans, it’s no fun (and not scary.) Only the ending is wonderfully weird.
Why am I playing film critic on a JHJ website? It’s just that every time I watch a movie, I try to imagine JHJ in it. All 3 movies are different from the usual run-of-the-mill stuff churned out by studios. But I don’t see JHJ ever acting in any one of them, or anything like them. Not much acting is required in “Avatar”, since the Na’vi which dominate the movie are digitally manufactured. I don’t think any Korean studio will finance a movie like “The Lovely Bones” which wins critical acclaim but not box office intakes. As for “Thirst”, no nudity of an sort for JHJ, please, Cannes Film Festival prize notwithstanding. JHJ as Andrea in “Love Letter” is nonpareil, but as a vampire-priest? Robert Pattinson, move aside!






















Recent Comments